1. In view of the following statements found in the order of the High Court


"We have heard the learned counsel for the parties during the course of arguments, Mr. Sodhi learned senior advocate stated that the service of the workmen will only be terminated in accordance with law, that till their services are terminated they for all intents and purposes would be treated at a par with the regular employees (watchmen) of the Corporation and that those workmen would get all the fringe benefits which the regular employees (watchmen) are getting


On the other hand, Mr. Surjit Singh learned counsel for the workmen, accepted the statement of Mr. N. K. Sodhi and further stated that the workmen would not say no if they are sought to be transferred from one depot to another by the Corporation. It was also stated by the learned counsel that the question of creating any post for the workmen by the Food Corporation of India does not arise, as legally this may not be permissible and that the Corporation may proceed against the workmen only in accordance with law


In view of what was stated at the bar, the learned counsel for the parties ar agreed that in view of their statements, these writ petitions be disposed of and to that extent the award of the Tribunal be taken to have been modified."


We do not

think it is fit for interference under Article 136 of the constitution. Special leave petition is dismissed accordingly. Court Master.