V. RAMASWAMI, J.


As per the notification and the earlier history of the notifications relating to vegetables, there was no dispute that if it was green garlic it would be considered as a vegetable and exempted. In this case, the Tribunal pointed out that it was not the plea of the Revenue that the garlic in question is both dried and dehydrated. If that was so, certainly the exemption provision will apply.


Learned counsel for the Revenue relied on the decision in M. R. Arumuga Nadar v. State of Tamil Nadu 1984 (56) STC 53 (Mad.) which related to a consideration of red ripe fruit chillies which was considered as not vegetable. In fact the discussion shows that far from helping the Revenue it supports the view of the Tribunal that green garlic cannot be considered to be not a vegetable. Apart from this, we are concerned with the notification which exempted only dried and dehydrated vegetables from the definition of "vegetables" and the

refore there are no grounds to interfere with the order of the Tribunal. The tax case is therefore dismissed.